Actress Zoe Kazan, writer and star of the new romantic comedy "Ruby Sparks" |
For the past two weeks Tumblr has been on my
case, relentlessly plugging the new film Ruby
Sparks with GIFs, screenshots, trailers, what-have-you. The
title itself did nothing to elicit a curious response; I wasn’t even positive
that it was a movie until late in the game. So naturally I ignored the “meh”-looking
propaganda thrown my way.
Dumb move. The film, directed by the husband-wife
duo behind Little Miss Sunshine, boasts an appealing
backstory. Remember Meryl Streep’s grown children in It’s
Complicated? Those three impossibly well-groomed offspring that
looked more like a cast of J.Crew models than bi-products of a Meryl
Streep/Alec Baldwin divorce? Yeah, the youngest one (real name: Zoe
Kazan) began writing a script in 2009. She was only 25, people! I
have a sickening feeling that by the time I’m 25 I will have only mastered
using the coffeemaker… much less Microsoft Excel.
Kazan, left, in "It's Complicated" aka the J.Crew Spring 2009 Catalogue |
Anyway. I’m impressed. And completely smitten
with the other half of this film’s origin story. (Can I even use the term
“origin story” when it’s not in reference to a superhero? Supernerds, I require
guidance.) Kazan wrote the film with her boyfriend of five years, actor Paul
Dano, in mind for the film’s protagonist. For those of you who may
need a refresher course, Dano played Abigail Breslin’s silence vowin’ brother
in Little Miss Sunshine and later starred in the Oscar-nominated There
Will Be Blood. Kazan plays opposite, as Dano’s fictionalized,
ideal girlfriend who inexplicably becomes a real person. That is, Ruby Sparks.
Kazan and Dano portray a couple caught in an unusual romance. |
What caught my especial interest is Kazan’s take on the “manic pixie dream girl”
archetype in movies. (Ruby Sparks has been unfairly labeled as another
“sullen pseudo-hipster meets his wacky dream girl” vehicle on several
occasions.) Kazan says,
“Everybody is setting out to write a full character. It’s just that some people are limited in their imagination of a girl… I think defining a girl and making her lovable because of her music taste or because she wears cute clothes is a really superficial way of looking at women. I did want to address that. … I am definitely not interested in adding to the genre of Manic Pixie Dream Girl. I’m very happy to have this movie read as a critique of that, if that’s how you want to read it. It’s not how I wrote it — that was not my primary goal. But I really, really think it’s dangerous to reduce a person to an idea.”
“Everybody is setting out to write a full character. It’s just that some people are limited in their imagination of a girl… I think defining a girl and making her lovable because of her music taste or because she wears cute clothes is a really superficial way of looking at women. I did want to address that. … I am definitely not interested in adding to the genre of Manic Pixie Dream Girl. I’m very happy to have this movie read as a critique of that, if that’s how you want to read it. It’s not how I wrote it — that was not my primary goal. But I really, really think it’s dangerous to reduce a person to an idea.”
Hats off to the girl that finally addressed the MPDG issue, making her a heroine to Warby
Parker bespeckled girls everywhere.
Entertainment Weekly
recently published an article about this “indie darling” couple and their
cinematic baby. To which I respond: I might not even care if this movie is horrific; I find both Kazan and Dano extremely
likeable in print.
The trailer for Ruby Sparks, out now:
What say you, film connoisseurs?
P.S. I'm FINALLY
getting a romantic comedy out of Daniel Radcliffe. He and Kazan will star in The
F-Word, a movie about two friends navigating the art of remaining friends,
not lovers. Production starts in August!
No comments:
Post a Comment